Candace Cameron Bure does not back down over backlash on ‘inappropriate’ pictures with husband

Candace Cameron Bure has been coming under a lot of scrutiny in the media recently. The actress was recently in the news for her comments about ‘traditional marriage’ that not everyone agreed with.

The actress is now making waves for another reason; a picture she posted with her husband.

Candace Cameron Bure met her husband Valeri Bure in 1994 at a hockey game. And two years later on June 22, 1996, they tied the knot and became husband and wife.

Even though they have been married for over 20 years, the two of them are still very much in love and make sure to keep the spark alive.

The playfulness of their marriage was very obvious from a story Bure posted on Instagram. However, some people mistook the playfulness as ‘inappropriate’ and the actress got a lot of backlash from her audience.

And in the face of backlash, Bure did not back down. She instead doubled down and posted the picture on her feed. She shared two pictures of her and her husband sharing the “sweet and spicy” nature of their relationship. In the second photo, Valerie has an arm around his wife’s shoulder and his hand is resting on her chest.

She was told by fans that the picture was a little too ‘racy’ for her as her stature as a ‘Christian celebrity.’ But the actress had a response for those who were upset. She said, “Sorry if it offended you… I’m actually not sorry,” she said while laughing in a follow-up video shared on her Instagram stories. “I’m glad that we have fun together after so many years.”

She said she was just showing what a “good and healthy marriage” looked like 24 years.

“It makes me laugh because it’s my husband,” she further explained in her follow-up Instagram story video. “He can touch me any time he wants and I hope he does.”

What did you think about Cameron Candace Bure’s relationship with her husband? Let us know in the comments below.

Here Is Why They Are Getting Rid Of All Their Self-Service Checkout Machines

During a time when seIf-administration checkouts have turned into the standard in stores, one UK basic food item chain is taking a striking action by getting back to completely staffed checkouts.

Corners, an upmarket general store chain with 27 stores across Northern Britain in Lancashire, Cumbria, Yorkshire, and Cheshire, has chosen to say goodbye to the majority of its seIf-administration works, focusing on human association and client assistance over robotization.

Corners, frequently named the “northern Waitrose” because of its standing for quaIity and client support, has taken a novel position on this. The choice to eliminate self-administration checkouts was incited by client input and a longing to give a more private shopping experience.

Stalls overseeing chief, Nigel Murray, underscored their obligation to consumer loyalty, expressing, Our clients have Iet us know this over the long haul, that oneself sweep machines that we have in our stores can be slow, temperamental, and unoriginal.

The transition to once again introduce human clerks into most Stalls stores Iines up with the general store’s benefits of advertising elevated degrees of warm, individual consideration. In a time where computerization and man-made reasoning have become progressively common in the retaiI area, Corners is standing firm for “genuine knowledge” given by human clerks.

Stalls’ choice has ignited an energetic discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of seIf-administration checkouts, particularly with regards to the continuous issue of shoplifting. The English Free Retailers Affiliation (BIRA) has brought up that the ongoing degree of retail robbery represents a critical test for retailers depending on self-administration works, which can turn into a costIy gamble.

This brings up issues about the adequacy of robotized checkout frameworks in hindering robbery and the generaI money saving advantage examination for retailers.

The transition to get back to completely staffed checkouts is certainIy not a one-size-fits-all choice for Stalls, as they intend to keep up with self-administration works in only two of their stores — those situated in the Lake Locale at Keswick and Windermere.

These exemptions depend on the stores elevated degrees of client traffic, where the accommodation of seIf-administration might in any case be liked.

Stalls, with its rich history tracing all the way back to 1847, remains as a demonstration of the getting through worth of individual client care.

In a retail scene over whelmed by comfort and robotization, the grocery store chain is putting an accentuation on the human touch, recognizing the significance of eye to eye connections in encouraging client dependability.

Related Posts

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*