Fans of “Family Feud” have been worried about Steve Harvey’s health recently, especially because he gained weight in the past and is now 67 years old. But in his latest updates, Harvey has shown everyone that he’s doing fine and there’s no need to worry.Family Feud Fans Love Host Steve Harvey
“Family Feud” fans really enjoy having Steve Harvey as the host. Even though some people have complained that the show has become less family-friendly and a bit more risqué, most viewers agree they love Harvey in charge. The show has been renewed until 2025-2026, which means it will be on for at least 50 years—a huge milestone. Many fans also hope Steve Harvey will keep hosting for a long time.
Fans Worried About Harvey’s Health?
As many longtime fans know, Steve Harvey wasn’t always slim. In the 90s and early 2000s, he struggled with his health and was much heavier. He had to make big changes in his life to get healthier. Recently, fans have been concerned again, noticing that he walks like an older man and smokes cigars. Even though Harvey has made big improvements to his lifestyle in the past 10-15 years, many fans are still worried about his health.
Family Feud: Steve Harvey Silences Critics, Shows Off Weight Loss And More
Many “Family Feud” fans have been concerned about Steve Harvey’s health, but he recently put those worries to rest in a big way. Harvey posted on social media to celebrate his wife’s 60th birthday, and while many people left kind messages, they couldn’t help but notice how great Steve looked in a sleek, fitted black outfit.
Fans were quick to notice how slim Steve Harvey looked in his latest post, showing off a slender figure. With some fans recently being worried and critical about his health, this update was a big statement.
One fan commented, “They both look so slim and good, wow.” Another said, “Wow, major transformation Steve. And always beautiful Marjorie.” A third added, “I don’t usually give compliments, but you look great, Big Homie.”
For more updates on “Family Feud” and Steve Harvey, check back with TV Shows Ace.
Heavily-Tattooed Woman Says It’s “Not Fair” That She Can’t Get A Job
Following a woman’s accusation that TJ Maxx was discriminating against her due to her appearance, a subsequent instance involving a job rejection at the store has generated controversy. 23-year-old Ash Putnam, who goes by @ashxobrien on TikTok, talked about how she was turned down for a part-time job at the store because of her body piercings and tattoos.
Putnam claims that after applying for the job, she got an email a few weeks later rejecting her application. Disappointed by the information, she vented her annoyance on TikTok and sparked a discussion on discrimination in employment.
Putnam’s initial grievance was with the impersonality of getting an email rejection instead of a call. Even though this is standard procedure for big businesses, she thought it was disrespectful considering how hard she worked to apply for the position.
When Putnam went to her neighborhood TJ Maxx to personally find out why she was rejected, a staff member informed her that she didn’t have enough experience for the role. Despite the employee’s insistence to the contrary, she suspected that her tattoos had a big influence on the choice.
Putnam stressed that, despite her unhappiness, she wasn’t necessarily in need of the work and was just looking for extra money to help her pay off debt faster. She thought it was unjust, though, that her tattoos appeared to be a deciding factor in her employability.
Putnam has obvious tattoos of images associated with Satanism, including a Leviathan Cross and a goat that symbolizes the god Baphomet. Thousands of TikTok users commented on her post, implying that her tattoos probably affected the decision, even though it’s unclear whether hiring supervisors noticed them when she applied.
Visible tattoos, according to some reviewers, may be viewed as unprofessional, particularly in jobs where employees interact with customers like those at TJ Maxx. Others brought out the difficulty of finding a job for young folks without any prior work experience if employers value experience over potential.
The event brought up more general concerns about how society views physical alterations and employment procedures. Putnam questioned why having a tattoo should prevent someone from getting a job, given that many tattoo bearers are quite skilled workers.
Putnam’s tattoos may not have had a direct impact on her rejection, but the event brings attention to the ongoing discussion over appearance-based discrimination in the workplace. It’s critical to think about how hiring procedures may be more inclusive and equal for all candidates, regardless of appearance, as the conversation continues.
Leave a Reply