Raising children these days can be a task on its own. Young parents don’t just have to hear opinions from family members but also have to put up with random strangers on the internet commenting on their parenting methods.
Jordan Driskell is a young father of five quintuplets. His quintuplets happen to be 5 years old. As you can imagine, looking after 5 children who are the same age can be quite taxing. Especially at 5-years-old when a child is curious and likes to explore.
31-year-old dad, Jordan Driskell decided to find a creative solution to his problem. He bought leashes meant for children to control his rambunctuous little kids when they are in public together.
In the past, Driskell had a 6-seat stroller that they used for their big family. However, that grew tiresome very quickly because the kids would be bothered when inside it. The stroller was also incredibly inconvenient to take anywhere.
This helps the little kids get to wander and explore their surroundings when the family goes out without their dad losing sight or control of them and hence keep them safe!
Driskell posted a video of the family’s outing to the acquarium that caused a lot of negative feedback directed towards the parents. The video of the kids on leashes went viral with over 3 million views. Hundreds of people commented about how the children were not animals and hence should not have been leashed.
Others commented, “If you can’t manage the pressure, don’t have so many kids.”
Other offered disdain masked as advice, “Can’t you just properly train your children?” Discuss to them why fleeing is risky.”
Dr. Deborah Gilboa, an expert in parenting and adolescent development had a different opinion. She does not think a leash will make your child think they are an animal. And if the alternative to a leash is to stay at home, then of course, the leash is a much better option!
Dr. Gilboa said a leash is a great tool for younger children or neuro-diverse children to be controlled in a public environment. However, she said that if a neurotypical child is not off a leash by the age of eight and nine, and hence has not developed their listening skills, that might be troublesome.
By then, parents should be able to effectively communicate with children verbally instead of relying on tools like leashes.
Parents should have the freedom to parent the way they want without facing unneccesary judgement from society.
What do you think of children on leashes in public? Let us know in the comments below. Share this article with friends and family to know what they think as well!
Jim Caviezel Takes a Stand and Refuses to Work with Robert De Niro, Calling It “Awful and Ungodly
Jim Caviezel, an actor, gained notoriety when he refused to collaborate with the well-known actor Robert De Niro, referring to him as a “awful, ungodly man.” Discussions concerning how to strike a balance between one’s personal convictions and one’s business ties have been sparked by this surprising attitude in Hollywood.
This article delves into the particulars of Caviezel’s audacious choice, the motivations behind his rejection of working with De Niro, and the wider ramifications of such candid remarks in the film business. Jim Caviezel is renowned for his unwavering moral standards and strong Christian beliefs. He is best known for playing Jesus Christ in Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ.”
However, the renowned actor Robert De Niro is praised for his wide range of roles and open views on a wide range of social and political topics. Caviezel’s unwillingness to work with De Niro highlights a tension between one’s moral principles and the collaborative nature of filmmaking.
Caviezel was questioned about possible partnerships with De Niro in a recent interview. He said, “I won’t work with Robert De Niro,” with great emphasis. He is an awful, immoral individual.
His statement’s forceful wording attracted the attention of fans and the media right once, raising concerns about the details of the purported falling out between the two stars. Caviezel refrained from providing specifics throughout the conversation, but it is clear that his choice is the result of a fundamental conflict of values.
Caviezel seems to feel that there is a difference between De Niro’s public image and his previous deeds, as evidenced by his strong Christian convictions and dedication to enterprises that share his moral principles.
Caviezel’s remark was vague, which sparked rumors and increased curiosity among the general public about the underlying dynamics. In the entertainment industry, performers frequently express their thoughts on a range of topics, including their decision to avoid working with particular people.
Reactions to Caviezel’s audacious declaration, though, have been divided. Some praise him for being true to his beliefs, seeing it as an uncommon display of integrity in a field that is sometimes criticized for its moral slackness. Some argue that releasing such declarations in public is a bad idea because it can restrict one’s options for a future job and maintain divisions within the profession.
The fact that Caviezel declined to collaborate with De Niro raises more questions about how performers deal with their personal convictions in the collaborative, sometimes divisive world of Hollywood. Though traditionally varied viewpoints and expressions have been beneficial to the trade, there is a growing trend of performers imposing limitations because of their personal beliefs.
This episode illustrates how Hollywood is changing and how people are prepared to stick to their morals even when it means jeopardizing their careers. There have been instances in the entertainment business where an actor’s public remarks have helped or hurt their career. The fact that Caviezel declined to collaborate with De Niro might strike a chord with like-minded people who respect his unyielding adherence to his convictions.
Leave a Reply