An adorable mystery in a peaceful suburban area captivated one worried family. It all started when Emma’s adored grandma would come over to watch her kids, and her hair would seem to change inexplicably every time. What at first appeared to be harmless mischief gave Lydia, Emma’s mother, cause for concern.
Emma was six years old, full of energy and charming curls who loved her grandmother. But Lydia couldn’t help but notice the distinct changes to Emma’s hair that only happened while her grandmother was taking care of her. Lydia acted, determined to find out the truth and protect her daughter.
Lydia took an unorthodox approach and put covert cameras all over the house. She was trying to find a solution to the confusing circumstance. However, what the video showed was unexpected and uplifting at the same time.
Lydia saw private moments of a grandmother and granddaughter participating in what seemed to be a treasured bonding ritual through the lens of the hidden cameras. Emma, prompted by her grandmother’s tales of her early years as a hairdresser, had naively requested to play “salon.”
Emma’s grandmother willingly catered to the small girl’s demands without any malice in her heart. Emma would happily cut her own hair while being closely observed and guided by her. These were times of storytelling, laughter, and the kind of happiness that leaves enduring childhood memories.
Lydia’s worries vanished after learning this, and were replaced with a deep sense of appreciation and understanding. Rather of criticizing her mother, Lydia saw this as a chance to have a meaningful family discussion about boundaries, creativity, and the value of communication.
Lydia made the decision to provide Emma’s growing interest in hairstyling with more structure. She signed Emma up for weekend workshops for kids, where the young girl could pursue her interest under the direction of seasoned experts.
What was once a bewildering enigma was transformed into a touching story about the beauty of intergenerational relationships and the enduring power of family ties. The family was reminded by this unexpected journey that sometimes the most basic gestures of love and treasured customs provide the answers we seek.
Drew Barrymore and her grandfather’s friend Vincent Price together in 1984…Check c,o,m,m,e,n,t,s below
Even though there are dozens of different experts that work on the appearances of characters in movies, they aren’t immune to making mistakes. And in the end, viewers may catch these fails in makeup or costume choices that couldn’t have possibly existed during the time in which the movie was set.
We at Bright Side decided to watch some of our favorite movies and read some fashion history books to find the mistakes makeup artists and costume designers have made in popular films.
Gone with the Wind
No matter how trendy Scarlett O’Hara was, she couldn’t have predicted the clothing trends for decades in advance. Her famous slim-fitting red dress with feathers and rhinestones has nothing to do with Civil War fashion — it was inspired more by styles from the 1930s and 1940s.
Julius Caesar
In the 1953 film, most of the female characters wore extravagant bullet bras. In Ancient Rome, women would wear a strophium, a prototype for the modern bra, but these weren’t bullet bras.
Legends of the Fall
Trying to create a romantic look, costume designers ignored the historical facts. Brad Pitt’s character has beautiful blonde hair and facial hair but these things were unacceptable for the time period. More and more men were choosing to don big mustaches and short hair at this time.
King Arthur
The film, which is set in the fifth century, portrays knights in heavy metal armor. But until the fourteenth century, such armor was made of leather, and only mail armor was made of metal.
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
The film is about events that happened in the ’90s and the clothes look pretty accurate, however, they’re still not perfect. Dudley Dursley is wearing G-Unit shorts — a brand that was created by 50 Cent in 2003.
Hello, Dolly!
The movie is set in New York at the end of the nineteenth century when such a hairstyle, lip gloss, and eye makeup didn’t exist. But the movie still got 3 Oscars and became one of the most important films of the decade.
Queen Margot
Throughout the entire film, the characters are wearing beautiful dresses with open shoulders. They look great but in the sixteenth century, women never ignored shifts (or chemise in French). These pieces of clothing protected them from the cold, absorbed sweat, and were really easy to wash.
Another mistake costume designers made was the way the main character’s hair was let down. Based on the few portraits we have of Margaret of Valois, she had curly hair that she wore up.
The Danish Girl
The Danish Girl starts in 1926 but in the first half of the film, we see women in slim-fitting clothes that have nothing to do with the fashion of the 1920s.
At the beginning of the film, Gerda has a hairstyle that was actually quite outdated for the setting that favored waved or bobbed hair.
A Dangerous Method
In one scene, Keira Knightley appears only in her corset, which is a contradiction to the original rules that came along with wearing this piece of clothing. A woman would never wear a corset alone.
Bonus: Mary Queen of Scots
In Mary Queen of Scots, Saoirse Ronan is wearing asymmetric earrings, which were non-existent in sixteenth-century Scotland.
In your opinion, do you think such mistakes are serious or no big deal?
Preview photo credit A Dangerous Method / Recorded Picture Company
Leave a Reply