Social media is buzzing with criticism for Jennifer Lopez’s “rude” behavior toward a Met Gala guest, as seen in a viral video shared on Instagram and TikTok.
At the Met Gala, J. Lo, 54, caused a stir with her short response to a red carpet reporter. The event made headlines for other reasons too, like a salmon farming tycoon stealing the spotlight and Kim Kardashian getting flak for wearing a cardigan.
With the dress code themed around “The Garden of Time” and the exhibition titled “Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion,” there was a lot of room for creativity among fashion designers dressing celebrities. People were eager to see what everyone would wear.
As Lopez made her way up the iconic Met Gala red carpet, adorned in a breathtaking silver gown that seemed to carry its own weight, she found herself approached by Anika Reed, a senior editor from USA Today. With the buzz of cameras and the anticipation of the night filling the air, Reed asked the simple yet essential question: “Who are you wearing tonight?”
J. Lo’s response was brief, almost dismissive: “Schiaparelli.” With a quick once-over glance, she seemed to size up Reed before moving on, her attention drifting away without much fanfare. Reed, keen to capture every moment of the star-studded event, recorded the exchange, later sharing it on social media with the caption: “#metgala co-chair @jlo briefly told me about her look for the night: @schiaparelli ✨.”
Many social media users didn’t hold back their disappointment in Lopez’s treatment of Reed, taking to various online platforms to voice their disapproval. One Instagram user criticized her, “So rude,” while another condemned her behavior as “always mean” and “just unclassy.”
Another person had strong opinions on the matter, stating, “She didn’t even bother to look at the poor woman”, or, “Why is she giving mean girl vibes?”.
While some admired Lopez’s attire, there was clear disdain for her personality, as one user remarked, “The dress is incredible, the person wearing it not so much.” The incident sparked a flurry of commentary, revealing the public’s mixed feelings towards the celebrity.
Despite the criticism, it was surprising to many that the dress worn by J. Lo had taken more than 800 hours to be made.
Preview photo credit heyitsanika / Instagram, jlo / Instagram
A man decides to film a tree in the woods for one year: What the camera captured was breathtaking
Throughout an entire year, a solitary tree deep within the heart of the forest becomes the focal point of an extraordinary cinematic journey. The camera’s lens captures the mesmerizing spectacle of life unfolding within the jungle’s embrace, offering a rare glimpse into the essence of the woodland realm.
Initiated by a motion-sensing camera strategically positioned amidst the trees, the footage reveals a rich tapestry of activity as various forms of local fauna traverse the landscape, drawn to the enigmatic allure of this singular tree.
In a remarkable display of natural splendor, the jungle awakens around this designated “special” tree, teeming with vibrant life and boundless energy. The scene unfolds like a masterpiece, showcasing the dynamic interplay between creatures great and small.
Witnessing this spectacle, one can’t help but marvel at the intricate dance of life that unfolds beneath the forest canopy. It’s as though the tree itself becomes a coveted landmark, passing hands among the denizens of the woods with each fleeting visitation.
Even for those intimately familiar with the countryside, the sheer magnitude of activity captured in the footage defies expectation, revealing a bustling ecosystem thriving beyond the scope of human perception.
Indeed, the woodland wildlife that surrounds us often offers but a mere glimpse into the intricate workings of nature’s domain. The forests remain shrouded in mystery, their inhabitants elusive and wary of human presence.
Yet, through this remarkable video documentation, we are afforded a rare opportunity to peer into the hidden world of the forest, gaining insight into the bustling vitality that persists in our absence.
Leave a Reply