My In-Laws Didn’t Invite My Children to Family Dinner, Disparagingly Calling Them “Baggage”

Our reader Nadine sent us an emotional letter. The fact is that her in-laws invited the whole family over for dinner, leaving her children out. To make matters worse, her husband knew this and approved of this behavior.

This is Nadine’s letter.

We decided to find out what readers think about this situation. All of them found the behavior of the husband and in-laws offensive.

  • I have a very short answer that I use on occasion, and that is. When people show you who they are, believe them. Whatever is said now and whatever apologies made, you know who they all are. © Linda Fawcett / Facebook
  • If my kids weren’t welcome at whatever function, I wouldn’t go either. © Sandy Freed / Facebook
  • I would have left straight away and if my husband didn’t follow, I would have finished my marriage, when it comes to my kids no one wins over them. © Liz Russell Flaherty / Facebook
  • I’d ask my hit if he cared about me and the kids. And then I’d leave the restaurant with or without him. © Faye Birkbeck / Facebook
  • This happened to us for a wedding. Other kids were there. We drove 3 hours to get there, so we were stuck. That was 40 years ago. I never forgot. © Regina Mason / Facebook
  • My children come first, they are not baggage’s … it does not matter if you’re blood or not, kindness should be organic. © M Otto Rittah Rxs / Facebook
  • I would seriously consider whether you stay with your husband, as he clearly hasn’t accepted your children. To say that they shouldn’t be at a family gathering because they’re not blood relatives, means he agrees with your in-laws. I can only imagine how your kids feel with their ‘so called’ dad, disowning them in this manner. © James Wood / Facebook

Conflict with in-laws is not uncommon. Here is the story of a young woman who decided to teach her insolent mother-in-law a lesson.

After Husband Dies, Widow Inherits Cheap Pendant and Lady She Never Met Inherits His Property

This story offers a poignant look at love, loss, and unexpected family ties. Agatha and Richard’s life together was built on years of companionship, trust, and an acceptance of life’s challenges. In the end, Richard’s decision to leave his estate to Sue reflects his deep empathy and a desire to support the child he never knew he had. At the same time, he took measures to ensure Agatha’s well-being, knowing that his choice could leave her feeling blindsided and hurt.

The pendant and hidden note serve as a reminder of the unique love they shared and Richard’s respect for Agatha’s role in his life. In choosing not to contest the inheritance, Agatha honors Richard’s wishes, a quiet acknowledgment of his care for both her and his newly discovered daughter. The story concludes with a sense of peace for Agatha, whose life finds new purpose in her condo in Florida while she stays connected to the farm, a symbol of Richard’s legacy and Sue’s new family.

The takeaways from Agatha’s story are universal:

1. Compassionate planning** – Richard’s thoughtful division of assets shows how important it is to consider everyone impacted by an inheritance, including unexpected family members.

2. Transparent communication** – Though Richard chose not to tell Agatha about Sue directly, his hidden message reveals his consideration for Agatha’s emotional journey, demonstrating the power of transparency in a partnership.

3. Resilience and letting go** – Agatha’s decision to let go of the property without contention reflects her resilience and love for Richard, finding peace in her memories while allowing Sue to carry forward the family’s legacy.

The story ultimately reminds us that love transcends inheritance and that true wealth lies in the memories and relationships we cultivate along the way.

Related Posts

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*