Sensational reports claim that Queen Camilla was left enraged by Prince Harry‘s decision to rush home across the Atlantic after hearing of his father’s cancer diagnosis without first getting palace approval.
RadarOnline, citing the National Enquirer, have today made bold claims regarding the fractious relationship between Camilla and her stepson, including that the former was responsible for the meeting between Harry and Charles being held to only thirty minutes.
Harry flew back to the UK from the US upon being informed of Charles’s cancer diagnosis – reportedly by Charles himself – but his return did not seem to set the stage for any future peace talks, as some had hoped.
Rather, Harry’s actual meeting with his father was kept brief, with the King reportedly journeying by helicopter to the royal estate of Sandringham. Harry, it has been rumored, was not permitted to follow.
Exactly what father and son talked about is not known, nor is it likely to be shared with the public moving forward. Details of Charles’ cancer have also been held back from public knowledge; we know the King is receiving treatment, but very few are privy to what sort of cancer he is suffering from, or what stage he is in.
In any case Harry’s recent trip to the UK wasn’t a big hit with all the royals. It’s been heavily rumored that Prince William had no intention of seeing his younger brother, and RadarOnline have today published a report suggesting that Queen Camilla was left seething as a result of her stepson’s actions.
“Her Majesty was furious Harry flew in from his ritzy California home without getting palace approval — and came with an attitude,” a source is said to have told the National Enquirer.
The same report states that Harry ordered that Camilla leave the room before he talked to his father – needless to say, this was not well received by Camilla.
“I’m told Camilla was outraged,” the source went on. “She’s taken a lot of bile from Harry for years and couldn’t wait to let him have it.”
Harry and Camilla have been at odds with one another for years now, allegedly stemming from Harry’s insistence that she was to blame for breaking up the marriage between Charles and Princess Diana.
“Camilla has taken it all on the chin, but using her husband’s cancer as a ‘loving son’ PR stunt was the last straw,” the source continued.
“After the father-son reunion, I hear she told Harry he’s a disgrace to his father, the family and the monarchy — and she left no doubt he isn’t wanted back!”
What do you think about the alleged animosity between Queen Camilla and Prince Harry? Let us know in the comments!
91-Yr-Old TikTok Star Wears Mini-Skirts And Dances For Her Followers
On TikTok or any other social media platform, you frequently see people dancing while wearing high heels and miniskirts. Maybe you’ve seen this yourself, but Betsy Lou doesn’t look quite like what you had in mind.
Everyone wants to make the most of life, and Betsy Lou is someone who personally feels strongly about that. She broke preconceptions as a grandma and became popular on TikTok. Who knows, maybe she’s just enjoying herself and not afraid at all.
Betsy Lou’s passion for dancing isn’t the only thing that makes her appealing; she also possesses a certain sense of style that one would expect from a granddaughter or even great granddaughter. She frequently appears in flashy outfits and short skirts.
On TikTok, Betty Lou has become into a bit of a Dan sensation in addition to being a style icon. It’s even more fascinating to watch because she really adores playing the piano, which she does so well.
She is undoubtedly a multi-talented woman, as you can see when you browse through her social media pages. She may appear to be dancing and showing off her moves at any point, but the 91-year-old said that the piano will play lovely music.
Betty Lou is definitely someone to keep an eye on, and her actions will probably cause her to become viral in the future. Just remember that she is who she is and doesn’t care who knows it, so don’t try to make her change who she is or how she looks.
Leave a Reply