For my family, mashed potatoes are more than just a side dish – they’re a cherished staple that brings everyone together. And while I’ve tried to introduce healthier options, nothing quite compares to the comfort and satisfaction of creamy mashed potatoes. That is until I stumbled upon a TikTok tip that completely transformed this classic dish.
User Jourdyn, known as @jeauxp on TikTok, shared a brilliant twist on traditional mashed potatoes – using chicken stock. Intrigued by this unconventional idea, I decided to give it a try and see if it could live up to the hype.
To my surprise and delight, the results were absolutely phenomenal. The chicken stock infused the potatoes with a subtle umami flavor, taking their taste to a whole new level. And here’s the best part – leaving the skins on while boiling added a rustic texture that was simply irresistible.
Encouraged by this newfound culinary revelation, I continued to experiment. One of my favorite variations was adding sour cream and chives to the mashed potatoes. The combination of flavors was out of this world, and the presentation impressed everyone at the table.
But my TikTok culinary journey didn’t stop there. I discovered more incredible tricks along the way. For example, I learned that adding a pinch of nutmeg to spinach can bring a whole new dimension of flavor. And who would have thought that a simple piece of bread could soften hardened brown sugar?
Let me tell you, these unconventional hacks have not only expanded my cooking repertoire but also added a touch of creativity to my meals. It’s amazing how a small twist or unexpected ingredient can completely transform a dish.So, if you’re feeling adventurous, why not consider these unconventional twists the next time you make mashed potatoes? Whether it’s trying out TikTok hacks or experimenting with unexpected ingredients, you never know when you might stumble upon your next favorite recipe. Trust me, your taste buds will thank you!
Do You Recognize This Old-School Communication Tool?
Times are changing and it seems as if the more we progress, the faster they change. The one thing that hasn’t changed is our need to communicate but the way we communicate has adjusted over the years.
Many of us can probably look back and remember the time when we were tethered to the wall when we wanted to talk to someone on the phone. We wrote letters and put them in the mail and if somebody wasn’t home, we couldn’t talk to them at that moment.
These days, we communicate by sending text messages or messages over social media. We have video calls and if we can get in touch with somebody, it quickly gets on our nerves.
There have also been a number of innovations over the years that were brilliant in their time but these days, they are not used very often. That is especially true in the day when we used to use the Postal Service to deliver letters and packages on a regular basis.
One of the most important things to consider when delivering a letter or package was the weight. It would make a difference in the shipping rate, and that is where this unique invention, the postal scale, comes into play.
Long before we were sending emails and text messages, we were delivering things through the Postal Service. Analog mechanisms that included balances and springs were used to determine how much we would pay in postage. It wasn’t an exact science, but it was close enough.
Postal scales still exist today but they are much more advanced. They are precise instruments that have advanced features and it makes it much less personal when it comes to getting service at the post office.
Aside from the fact that the older postal scales were not 100% accurate, the design and nostalgia are something to consider. These are more than an item that used to weigh the letters we sent, they are collector’s items and some enthusiasts will pay big money for them.
So if you ever see a vintage postal scale, stop to ponder over what it may have done in its lifetime. It’s an item we don’t use as much anymore, but it is an item from time that we should forget.
Leave a Reply